I just got back from home leave in Denver tonight. I was there for a week and a half but it felt like a year (in a good way). The first night in town I went to get Lisa from work and was thinking it would be nice to do something to get out. I had a movie or dinner in mind. Lisa gets to the truck and wants to know if I want to see a concert. "Why not" I answered. Big mistake, as the first thing I should have said was "Who is it?" She said Rob Thomas, for some reason I heard Rob Zombie. Same thing I guess. Rob wasn't so bad but he had two women opening for him, one of which was Jewel. I pride myself on being a progressive male but that was just too much chick rock in one night. Really there hasn't been a woman that can rock since Lita Ford, sorry that includes you KT Tungstall. The show was alright, it was at Red Rocks which is the best place to see a concert ever. We saw Lyle Lovett there a few years ago. Towards the end of the show he had a local gospel choir doing the song Church and a thunderstorm came out over the mountains. It was pretty impressive with the lightning flashing and the thunder booming right over head.
Now I've never done drugs and didn't drink until I was 21 but I was sorely disappointed in the youth of America at this concert. Is it a sign of the boring restrictive nature of the country we live in when over half the people at a concert leave two thirds into it? Is it too much to ask for a little danger in life? I guess maybe it would be a different story if it had been Rob Zombie. At my first concert (Van Halen with David Lee Roth no less) a girl, drunk off her ass sat down on my cousin's lap, put her arm around him and promptly realized she didn't know him. We saw another girl fall from one level to smack on the concrete floor below and get hauled off on a stretcher. I suppose these things still go on, I know they do at the Avalanche hockey games. And I know for a fact that I'm romanticizing it. Let's face it I haven't enjoyed a late night out since I was 30. I guess you're not really going to get chicks lifting their tops for Jewel, still wouldn't that be cool? As far as I can tell from Dateline exposés is the youth of America are even wilder than when I was a teen, it's just now they have to travel to Cancun to do it. I don't want to encourage reckless behavior (especially to any teenaged nieces who might read this). Looking back now, it probably wasn't even that fun when I was a teenager. After all, like I said, I didn't take drugs or get drunk. For me it was more like being on a safari, I never knew when some drunk gorilla would come out of the fog of all those joints and kick my Eric-Foreman-ass. I was living vicariously through my stoner friends misadventures, and it sure was fun watching the look in Jim's eyes when that girl sat down and ran her fingers through his hair.
Tuesday, July 11, 2006
Sunday, July 9, 2006
Home Leave Holiday
I had a busy vacation last week. I flew in to Denver on Wednesday, June 28th to see Lisa. We started out by seeing a concert that night at Red Rocks. It really is the best place I've ever seen a concert. That weekend we decided to go to Moab for some camping. Moab is special to us because that's where we went for our third date. This time was just as fun as the first. We went to the Canyonlands National Park. Lisa, being the daredevil she is, wanted to drive down Shafer Trail Road. It's an easy four wheel drive trail that cuts through the canyon floor and comes out 31 miles away at Moab. The first time we went to Canyonlands we also went to Dead Horse Point State Park. There's an overlook and you could see this road at the bottom. I remember wondering at the time how you could get down there and where it went. It was great to see the overlook from the opposite side this time.
We camped in a beautiful place along the Colorado River. After a full day of four wheeling and touring Arches National Park we headed into Moab for dinner at Pasta Jay's, a nice restaurant with a deck. Since we had been doing two days of primitive camping (ie, no showers) we thought it was a good idea to stay away from people as much as possible and to be outside. On the way home to Denver we stopped at Colorado National Monument. We've passed by before without stopping. I'm glad we took the time on this trip to check it out, it's a beautiful place. It got Lisa and I talking about how lucky we are to have these opportunities to travel and never want to take it for granted.
With just one day to shower and sleep in a bed, we were off to Leadville to camp over the 4th of July. We met Lisa's family at the Half Moon Bay campgrounds. It's a beautiful spot that most people don't know about. Lisa's brother Chris cooked up a great meal of salmon, chicken, corn and potatoes. That night it was freezing but Lisa is always prepared with the camping gear so we were nice and toasty. It was a pleasant change from the ninety plus degrees in Moab. There's a lot to be said for camping at 10,000 feet.
Later that day we took a train ride from Leadville along the old mining tracks towards Climax mines. Lisa had just been reading a book about the history of the molybdenum mines there so we had an interesting perspective during the trip. Lisa loves trains and was so excited she was bouncing in her seat. The trip was 2 and a half hours and pretty nice for the most part. There were some stretches of riding through the forest with not much in the way of scenery.Later that night we enjoyed the fireworks in Frisco. They weren't as good as the ones we've seen in Avon in years past but we weren't as close this time. It was still a good time though.
Finally, on Friday night, Lisa's sister Jennifer had a pre-wedding dinner for us. She went completely overboard and threw a great party. She's very sweet like that. At the party it really started to hit me that by the end of this month we'll be married. I can't wait.
So home leave was a smashing success and I really have the batteries recharged even more so than usual.
Tuesday, June 27, 2006
But Is It Art, Part 2
After reading my post on the "experts" on Flikr, my brother sent me a link to this bit of genuis.
What Is Head On?
Head On, apply directly to the forehead!
Head On, apply directly to the forehead!
Head On, apply directly to the forehead!
Has anyone else seen this stupid commercial. You can usually catch it on Robin & Friends on CNN Headline News in the morning. The above line is all the ad says. There's no explanation of what it is and the website doesn't offer any enlightenment. It's almost a perfect marketing strategy. I am so curious I know I'll be finding it at Walmart just to see what it does. And of course they get a little free publicity on here. I'll check into it at Walmart but I won't buy it just because they've really annoyed the crap out of me.
Head On, apply directly to the forehead!
Head On, apply directly to the forehead!
Has anyone else seen this stupid commercial. You can usually catch it on Robin & Friends on CNN Headline News in the morning. The above line is all the ad says. There's no explanation of what it is and the website doesn't offer any enlightenment. It's almost a perfect marketing strategy. I am so curious I know I'll be finding it at Walmart just to see what it does. And of course they get a little free publicity on here. I'll check into it at Walmart but I won't buy it just because they've really annoyed the crap out of me.
Saturday, June 24, 2006
But Is It Art
I'm trying to learn how to use my Nikon D70. I've had it for a year and I'm still using it in point and shoot mode. I love photography. I love looking at pictures, taking pictures and reading about taking pictures. I just wish I was better at taking photos. I thought I was doing okay until my brother turned me on to Flikr.com. It's a great photo site and community for sharing interests. I enjoy sharing motorcycle photos with people that have the same passion for bikes and travel as I have. There for awhile though, I started getting absorbed in the push to get my picture views up. I joined a couple of the "rate my photo" groups. My brother said it best when he noted that nothing sucks the fun out of something like having a know-it-all point out that your picture titled Sunset doesn't show the sun setting. Nevermind that it was taken at sunset. It took me about five minutes to quit all those groups and erase the comments. Life's been happier for the most part. There is however a recent thread in one of the discussion groups that got my ire up. In the Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Photography group one fellow thought that there was a lot of potential but far too much garbage there. He was one of those people that has become so prevelant since the advent of the world wide web. You know the type. He just wants to have a rational discussion, it's just his humble opinion. This guy was a little more civil than most but still had that smug attitude that drives me crazy. I try to stay out of these "debates" but made the mistake of getting sucked into this one. I found myself defending some of the pictures this guy was criticizing. He of course took this to mean that my feelings were personally hurt. The bad part is the guy came in, stirred up grief and left, and it was all for naught. I don't even think he was a regular member of the group.
I don't want it to sound like I can't take constructive criticism, I've learned quite a bit and it's usually from the people that are polite. I've actually been reading the owner's manual for my camera today and experimented a little with settings other than the auto features. The instructions are a little similar to the shuttle owner's manual. I want to get some experience under my belt in preparation for our honeymoon to England next year. Even if I don't improve I'm sure my pictures from England will make Lisa and me happy. The problem right now is that I think I actually took better pictures with my cheap 5 year old Kodak DC290. I'm not sure why, maybe I'm depending on the camera to do it all now. The picture above is an example from the old Kodak. I really like this one. Hope I can get that good with my expensive new D-SLR.
I don't want it to sound like I can't take constructive criticism, I've learned quite a bit and it's usually from the people that are polite. I've actually been reading the owner's manual for my camera today and experimented a little with settings other than the auto features. The instructions are a little similar to the shuttle owner's manual. I want to get some experience under my belt in preparation for our honeymoon to England next year. Even if I don't improve I'm sure my pictures from England will make Lisa and me happy. The problem right now is that I think I actually took better pictures with my cheap 5 year old Kodak DC290. I'm not sure why, maybe I'm depending on the camera to do it all now. The picture above is an example from the old Kodak. I really like this one. Hope I can get that good with my expensive new D-SLR.
Tuesday, June 20, 2006
Beautiful, Sweet Justice
I just saw a bit of good news from the Cato Institute.
This little article helped make my day.
News Release
June 19, 2006
Media Contact: (202) 789-5200
Supreme Court Rebuffs Senseless EPA Regulation
Supreme Court Sides with Cato Brief
WASHINGTON -- Today, the U.S. Supreme Court rebuffed an expansive reading of federal power by environmental regulators. In Rapanos v. United States, regulators claimed federal wetlands laws allow them to micromanage development of Michigan property through which a trickle of water drained, even though the land was high, dry, and land-locked. The landowner, John Rapanos, fought back, arguing that the federal Clean Water Act doesn't give regulators control over any land from which water might occasionally flow. In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court agreed.
According to Tim Lynch and Mark Moller, authors of Cato's friend-of-the-court brief in support of Mr. Rapanos, the Court reached the right decision: "If the government can regulate any land from which water occasionally drains, no matter how speculative the effect of this drainage on navigable water, wetlands law gives it almost limitless jurisdiction over private property, except perhaps in the heart of the Mojave desert. In essence, the federal government's reading of the Clean Water Act would turn the EPA into a vast national zoning board.
"The English language says otherwise. The Clean Water Act gives the federal government the power to protect navigable water and regulate some land 'adjacent' to navigable water -- not control every rivulet of water that trickles through your lawn. What's remarkable about this case is not the outcome -- but the government's ability to argue its reading of federal law with a straight face."
This little article helped make my day.
Wednesday, June 14, 2006
Critical Shortage Of Causes Haunt Celebrities

Poor Daryl Hannah, Leonardo DeCaprio, Ed Harris and Charlie Sheen (?!?). It seems like we're going down hill in the cause department. From the big one, war, to immigration and on down the scale to Tom Cruise's bizarre grudge against pharmaceuticals, it's been a good year for watching Hollywood show it's ass. I remember laughing out loud when I heard Charlize Theron take an oath to not marry until gays and lesbians could marry. Daryl and her erstwhile friends are attempting to save a 14 acre garden in LA.. Or I should say were. It seems that someone realized that the leggy, blonde nut in the walnut tree was actually Daryl at which time she was promptly removed. On the surface it seems like a small, worthy cause I guess. 350 families grew food there, the owner decided to sell his land on which a werehouse would be built. No one wants to see 350 families go hungry. It turns out most of the people had already been successfully relocated. I hate to see 14 acres of pleasant green vegetation disappear but is it really worth living in a tree for 3 weeks? I guess it is for some people. Good for her.
"I felt an extreme sense of urgency. Not only did I have to climb up the tree, I had to pull up the rope behind me so they could not follow me," the actress told the Los Angeles Times by cell phone from her tree perch.Has there ever been a funnier quote? Celebs, it's like two for the price of one with them. We get to enjoy their movies and be entertained by their real world exploits. There's nothing they can't do.
Since that whole issue is resolved maybe we can all go back to praying for a day when Charlize Theron can marry.
Sunday, June 11, 2006
V-Twin Powered Car

If you've noticed which vehicles are creating a buzz in the aftermarket, you may have seen a proliferation of rocket-powered space-frame road cars that owe a fair amount of their design to unskinned Formula 1 racers.
That's probably because Formula racers get paid to know what works, and it would be great if someone could figure out how to get those cars on the street. Well, TwinTech has, only with a V-twin twist
The whole article is at Kit Car Magazine's website. The website listed for Twintech doesn't seem to work. It takes you to what is apparently a poorly designed Norwegian IT resources company.
As for the car it's an interesting design but being a sport bike fan I'm more partial to the Suzuki GSX-R Concept Car.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)